Certified Public Procurement Officer (CPPO) Practice Test 2025 - Free CPPO Practice Questions and Study Guide

Question: 1 / 400

Which of the following is NOT a typical reason for constructive suspension?

Agency convenience

Funding delays

Termination for cause

The correct choice reflects a fundamental understanding of the factors that commonly lead to constructive suspension in procurement processes. Constructive suspension occurs primarily due to external factors that impede the progress of a contract without formally halting it.

Agency convenience involves situations where the agency finds it necessary or advantageous to delay or suspend work for its own operational reasons. This reflects a typical scenario where the agency seeks to manage resources or align with strategic priorities.

Funding delays are another common cause of constructive suspension, where the inability to secure or release funds prevents the continuation of contracted work. This can occur in situations where budget approvals or financial constraints arise unexpectedly.

Inspection delays refer to interruptions caused by the need for inspections or reviews to affirm compliance with contractual specifications. If an inspection cannot take place as scheduled, it can hinder the project’s progression, leading to constructive suspension.

In contrast, termination for cause relates to the formal ending of a contract due to the contractor's failure to meet contractual obligations. This scenario is a definitive conclusion of the relationship and does not align with the concept of constructive suspension, which involves an ongoing contract that cannot proceed for reasons other than fault on the part of the contractor. Since termination for cause signifies a complete cessation of the contractual relationship and is not a reason for suspending

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Inspection delays

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy